Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft: Smart Debugger Plugin #4115

Open
ajutamangdev opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 9 comments
Open

Draft: Smart Debugger Plugin #4115

ajutamangdev opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
hosting-request Request to host a component in jenkinsci needs-fix security-audit-done The hosting request code passed the security audit with success

Comments

@ajutamangdev
Copy link

Repository URL

https://github.com/ajutamangdev/smart-debugger-plugin

New Repository Name

smart-debugger-plugin

Description

This plugin enhances Jenkins builds with advanced debugging capabilities powered by a Large Language Model (LLM). It allows developers to quickly identify and resolve issues, streamline their workflow, and improve overall build reliability.

GitHub users to have commit permission

@ajutamangdev

Jenkins project users to have release permission

@ajutamangdev

Issue tracker

Jira

@ajutamangdev ajutamangdev added the hosting-request Request to host a component in jenkinsci label Oct 4, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Hello from your friendly Jenkins Hosting Checker

It appears you have some issues with your hosting request. Please see the list below and correct all issues marked Required. Your hosting request will not be approved until these issues are corrected. Issues marked with Warning or Info are just recommendations and will not stall the hosting process.

  • ⛔ Required: The parent pom version '4.75' should be at least '4.85' or higher.
  • ⛔ Required: The following usernames in 'Jenkins project users to have release permission' need to log into Jira: @ajutamangdev (reports are re-synced hourly, wait to re-check for a bit after logging in)
  • ⛔ Required: The following usernames in 'Jenkins project users to have release permission' need to log into Artifactory: @ajutamangdev (reports are re-synced hourly, wait to re-check for a bit after logging in)
  • ⛔ Required: The dependency com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp should be replaced with a dependency to the api plugin io.jenkins.plugins:okhttp-api

You can re-trigger a check by editing your hosting request or by commenting /hosting re-check

@jenkins-cert-app
Copy link
Collaborator

Security audit, information and commands

The security team is auditing all the hosting requests, to ensure a better security by default.

This message informs you that a Jenkins Security Scan was triggered on your repository.
It takes ~10 minutes to complete.

Commands

The bot will parse all comments, and it will check if any line start with a command.

Security team only:

  • /audit-ok => the audit is complete, the hosting can continue 🎉.
  • /audit-skip => the audit is not necessary, the hosting can continue 🎉.
  • /audit-findings => the audit reveals some issues that require corrections ✏️.

Anyone:

  • /request-security-scan => the findings from the Jenkins Security Scan were corrected, this command will re-scan your repository 🔍.
  • /audit-review => the findings from the audit were corrected, this command will ping the security team to review the findings 👀. It's only applicable when the previous audit required changes.

Only one command can be requested per comment.

(automatically generated message, version: 1.29.18)

@jenkins-cert-app jenkins-cert-app added the security-audit-todo The security team needs to audit the hosting request code label Oct 4, 2024
@jenkins-cert-app
Copy link
Collaborator

The Jenkins Security Scan discovered 1 finding(s) 🔍.

For every identified issue, please do one of the following:

  • Implement the recommended fix to address the issue.
  • If you think it's a false positive, suppress the warning directly within the code.
  • Alternative, you write an explanation here about why you think it's irrelevant. That will require a manual review, leading to a slower process.

After addressing the findings through one of the above methods:

  • If all modifications have been made to the code, please initiate a new security scan by triggering the /request-security-scan command.
  • If there are any unresolved findings (those not corrected or suppressed), request a review from the Jenkins security team by using the /audit-review command.

Jenkins: Plaintext password storage

You can find detailed information about this finding here.

SmartDebugger.java#25
Field should be reviewed whether it stores a password and is serialized to disk: apiToken

@jenkins-cert-app jenkins-cert-app added security-audit-needs-correction The security audit revealed issues that must be corrected from the hosting request and removed security-audit-todo The security team needs to audit the hosting request code labels Oct 4, 2024
@ajutamangdev
Copy link
Author

/hosting re-check

@ajutamangdev
Copy link
Author

/request-security-scan

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Hello from your friendly Jenkins Hosting Checker

It appears you have some issues with your hosting request. Please see the list below and correct all issues marked Required. Your hosting request will not be approved until these issues are corrected. Issues marked with Warning or Info are just recommendations and will not stall the hosting process.

  • ⛔ Required: The following usernames in 'Jenkins project users to have release permission' need to log into Jira: @ajutamangdev (reports are re-synced hourly, wait to re-check for a bit after logging in)
  • ⛔ Required: The following usernames in 'Jenkins project users to have release permission' need to log into Artifactory: @ajutamangdev (reports are re-synced hourly, wait to re-check for a bit after logging in)
  • ⛔ Required: The dependency com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp should be replaced with a dependency to the api plugin io.jenkins.plugins:okhttp-api

You can re-trigger a check by editing your hosting request or by commenting /hosting re-check

@jenkins-cert-app jenkins-cert-app added security-audit-todo The security team needs to audit the hosting request code and removed security-audit-needs-correction The security audit revealed issues that must be corrected from the hosting request labels Oct 4, 2024
@jenkins-cert-app
Copy link
Collaborator

The Jenkins Security Scan did not find anything dangerous with your plugin, congratulations! 🎉


💡 The Security team recommends that you are setting up the scan in your repository by following our guide.

@jenkins-cert-app jenkins-cert-app added security-audit-done The hosting request code passed the security audit with success and removed security-audit-todo The security team needs to audit the hosting request code labels Oct 4, 2024
@ajutamangdev
Copy link
Author

/hosting re-check

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 6, 2024

Hello from your friendly Jenkins Hosting Checker

It appears you have some issues with your hosting request. Please see the list below and correct all issues marked Required. Your hosting request will not be approved until these issues are corrected. Issues marked with Warning or Info are just recommendations and will not stall the hosting process.

  • ⛔ Required: The following usernames in 'Jenkins project users to have release permission' need to log into Jira: @ajutamangdev (reports are re-synced hourly, wait to re-check for a bit after logging in)
  • ⛔ Required: The following usernames in 'Jenkins project users to have release permission' need to log into Artifactory: @ajutamangdev (reports are re-synced hourly, wait to re-check for a bit after logging in)

You can re-trigger a check by editing your hosting request or by commenting /hosting re-check

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hosting-request Request to host a component in jenkinsci needs-fix security-audit-done The hosting request code passed the security audit with success
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants