Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can you create a dlrover arm64 image for Ascend NPU? #1248

Open
xmarker opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Can you create a dlrover arm64 image for Ascend NPU? #1248

xmarker opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@xmarker
Copy link

xmarker commented Aug 22, 2024

Since the Ascend NPU is popular in China, and the DLRover build script is based on Nvidia Arch, can you add DLRover build script support for Ascend NPU architecture? or build a arm64 dlrover image for Ascend NPU.
Thank you very much.

@majieyue majieyue changed the title 能基于华为晟腾NPU打一个arm64的dlrover镜像吗 Can you create a dlrover arm64 image for Ascend NPU? Sep 19, 2024
@majieyue
Copy link
Collaborator

Please send issues in english in the future. I've modified this one. Thank you for using dlrover

@BalaBalaYi BalaBalaYi added the question Further information is requested label Nov 27, 2024
@BalaBalaYi
Copy link
Collaborator

Whether to use Ascend NPU is actually not very related to the platform architecture of the image being used. In our internal practice, we are using an x86 platform. I feel that your concern is about compatibility with arm64. Regarding this issue, we currently have not practiced on arm64, and considering practical reasons, it will be challenging to have large-scale production practices based on arm64 in the near future. Most importantly, achieving compatibility with DLRover here is not the main point; the compatibility of the training itself is more critical.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants