We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As discussed with @tpietzsch, I tried to benchmark a different implementation of the access in the StackView class that does not suffer as much from this issue, because the access is only created lazily for a given slice on demand and not for all slices at once as in the original implementation
access
StackView
Let me know whether I should do more tests or create a PR to replace the old implementation with the new one. cc @axtimwalde
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
As discussed with @tpietzsch, I tried to benchmark a different implementation of the
accessin theStackViewclass that does not suffer as much from this issue, because the access is only created lazily for a given slice on demand and not for all slices at once as in the original implementationLet me know whether I should do more tests or create a PR to replace the old implementation with the new one.
cc @axtimwalde
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: