-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 290
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cannot reproduce faster rcnn mAP #72
Comments
i run |
Please check if today's commit from mxnet pr #6849 fixed the problem. |
@jiangxiaoyan @mAtthEwwww Can you reproduce the result now? Thanks. |
@Zehaos i have gave up |
I can't reproduce the resnet101+voc2017+voc2012 either. I'm using MXNet 0.11.1. |
I met the same problem as @ @jiangxiaoyan @mAtthEwwww ,I got vgg+alternate by 68.3MAP.Another problem is that I train resnet101+alternate,I got the high train accuracy and low loss,but only got a low test accuracy which is only 28MAP.What happened to me,anyone help? |
I find VGG still works by these steps. Results can fluctuate in 68 to 70 between experiments. Usually it is 69.xx or 70.xx. |
We did not fix random seed so results would vary between experiments. However, it is always around the reference on my end. Did you try to evaluate the released models? |
@k-miracle i have the same problem. I train resnet101+end2end, I got the high train accuracy and low loss,but only got a low test accuracy and map. img_pixel_means = (0.0, 0.0, 0.0). |
Please evaluate the released model. Let's look at inference stage first. |
i run
bash script/vgg_voc07.sh 1,2,3
, use three GPU cards, Tesla M40but "root:Means AP=0.6860", not like 70.23
can you give the detail for experiment config
also, i test 2 GPU cards. the mAP is only 0.6303. i do not understand why this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: