You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
great work! Could you by any chance allow the use of a custom index type? This makes a lot of sense e.g. for extremely shallow circuits, where the state vector is very sparse throughout but could e.g. be on 100 qubits; BigInt would be awesome, but if that's an issue then maybe at least Int128, as an option? And maybe even allow Int32, for relatively dense sparse matrices -- saves a lot of memory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://github.com/ZKSI/QI.jl/blob/53c59ff12e49b69558529275bdd0e974115fae74/attic/src/sparse/base_sparse.jl#L1
Hi there,
great work! Could you by any chance allow the use of a custom index type? This makes a lot of sense e.g. for extremely shallow circuits, where the state vector is very sparse throughout but could e.g. be on 100 qubits; BigInt would be awesome, but if that's an issue then maybe at least Int128, as an option? And maybe even allow Int32, for relatively dense sparse matrices -- saves a lot of memory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: