-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluation on Using ROS2 Iron on ergoCubSN000
#148
Comments
The two things that could prevent updating to Iron are:
cc @lrapetti |
To avoid the head issue we could exclude it completely from having ros2. So we could remove ros2 from the head and keep it only on the torso and the laptop. |
@GiulioRomualdi in the past used ergocub-head/realsense with ROS2, but I am not sure what it is the status now. |
I discussed this issue with f2f with @Nicogene and @pattacini. We concluded that it would be optimal to schedule a f2f meeting with also @traversaro and @GiulioRomualdi to check the impact on all groups about migrating to ROS2 iron.
|
The need of ros2 for the realsense was required for some preliminary test on visual odometry where I tried to use the imu of the realsense. Since on ergocub we have an xsens IMU on the robot root link, we currently do not need this feature. So long story short we do not use ROS2 at all |
From what I understand from @pattacini , the plan is now to update to ROS2 Iron, switching to do the installation with apt and not with conda. However, something that I missed is what is the plan with
What was the decision w.r.t. to this point? |
For what regards the head, I think that @randaz81 and @SimoneMic will rely on NWS, which also allows for some data compression. |
Ok, so I guess ROS2 will not be installed in ergocub-head. |
Actually I am testing some packages like |
Hello,
As per title, since ROS2 Iron (the latest release) has been released I think that we should evaluate the possibility to replace ROS2 Humble.
Here there are the release notes with the changes since Humble.
There are some pros, like the improved and managed discoverability of topics (similar to the issue that we had #142 ).
The con that I can think of is that it's not a long term supported version, unlike Humble. Comparison here.
Also since the HSP Navigation team is moving to Iron, it could be helpful to have all the projects in CRIS aligned on this. cc @randaz81
What would be the impact on switching to Iron on the actual robot?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: