Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AUVIDEA - X220 carrier - carrier for Jetson AGX Xavier #68

Open
6 tasks done
salvi-mattia opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 5 comments
Open
6 tasks done

AUVIDEA - X220 carrier - carrier for Jetson AGX Xavier #68

salvi-mattia opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
libraries-request - GENERIC All requests about MCAD and generic components

Comments

@salvi-mattia
Copy link
Member

Description EUVIDEA X220 carrier for Jetson AGX Xavier
Datasheet component https://auvidea.eu/product/70410/
Project ERGOCUB & MORE
Alias Creo AUVIDEA_X220_CARRIER
IIT-Code [if available]
Applicant @salvi-mattia
Supervisor @pattacini
Maintainer Marcello Savoldi, @marcellosavoldi
Coworkers @icub-tech-iit/silo-mech

Attachment:

immagine

immagine

Notes:

Checklist:

Complete the checklist in order to proceed with the request.

@salvi-mattia salvi-mattia added the libraries-request - GENERIC All requests about MCAD and generic components label Oct 19, 2021
@salvi-mattia salvi-mattia changed the title [manufacturer] - [part number] - [short description] EUVIDEA - 220 carrier - carrier for Jetson AGX Xavier Oct 19, 2021
@maggia80 maggia80 changed the title EUVIDEA - 220 carrier - carrier for Jetson AGX Xavier AUVIDEA - 220 carrier - carrier for Jetson AGX Xavier Oct 20, 2021
@maggia80 maggia80 changed the title AUVIDEA - 220 carrier - carrier for Jetson AGX Xavier AUVIDEA - X220 carrier - carrier for Jetson AGX Xavier Oct 20, 2021
@marcellosavoldi
Copy link
Member

if you have solved all the problems of importing the 3D file it can be fine as well (The part is a bit heavy, but maybe you can't do better ... is that correct?)
For the future it might be useful to insert the coordinate system on the connectors plug that will be used (MATE_CONN).
But perhaps it is better waiting to figure out which connectors will be used. What do you think @salvi-mattia ?

in the mean time see QUI.

example:
image

If you believe that they cannot be used for now, we can postpone until they will be used for assembly in the robot, and close the issue like this.

@fiorisi
Copy link
Member

fiorisi commented Dec 6, 2021

@salvi-mattia great.

I agree with @marcellosavoldi, the model is too heavy (86 Mb). Is there a simplified model? Otherwise we can import only the biggest components, neglecting the resistances for example.
If we need help, could be a good idea to ask to DEDA.

Please also align the code accordingly with the guidelines.

@maggia80
Copy link
Member

maggia80 commented Dec 6, 2021

this board is not going to be used in ergoCub 1.0. We might consider it for future development.

@fiorisi
Copy link
Member

fiorisi commented Dec 6, 2021

this board is not going to be used in ergoCub 1.0. We might consider it for future development.

Ok, thanks @maggia80.
So either we remove the file from CAD libraries or we address this comment.

@fiorisi
Copy link
Member

fiorisi commented Dec 15, 2021

See this comment: #68 (comment)

Gentle reminder for @salvi-mattia.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
libraries-request - GENERIC All requests about MCAD and generic components
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants