Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CE and CL data format key fields #185

Open
josefineegekvist opened this issue Sep 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

CE and CL data format key fields #185

josefineegekvist opened this issue Sep 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@josefineegekvist
Copy link
Collaborator

Can the CE and CL format fields listed below be added to the Unique Key? They currently creates duplicates in the data, as there can be several data sources of statiscial rectangle, mesh size ranges etc. by the current key.

  • Data source of statistical rectangle
  • Exclusive Economic Zone Indicator (EEZI)
  • Mesh size range
  • Supra Region
  • Geographical indicator
  • Specific conditions to technical measures
@nmprista
Copy link
Collaborator

also feeling the same issue - was forced to set some of those fields to "" ahead of upload

@HenrikK-N HenrikK-N self-assigned this Sep 29, 2023
@HenrikK-N
Copy link
Collaborator

Two other persons have also said that there is issue here, so I believe we need to add some of the fields like, Mesh size range, but we should not add 'Supra Region'. We can also discuss whether 'Geographical indicator' should be included or 'Jurisdiction Area' is doing the job if few codes added.
But at this late point of the data call, I think we will take the discussions after the data call deadline, so all countries upload data using the same unique key for the tables/records.

@HenrikK-N
Copy link
Collaborator

The 4 FDI fields have been added. The Core Group think the Data source of statistical rectangle
Exclusive Economic Zone Indicator (EEZI) also should be added.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants