Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 4, 2022. It is now read-only.

Directive collision #134

Open
Kansuler opened this issue Jun 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Directive collision #134

Kansuler opened this issue Jun 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Kansuler
Copy link

I'm using a project with Svelte and three-elements and there is a collision when using the ref: directive. Svelte emits a deprecation warning that at the moment cannot be intercepted. The ref directive is no longer supported — use bind:this={material} instead.

I've started an issue in the Svelte repository about being able to intercept these errors, however ref is not uncommon as a directive.

I'd like to put forward two suggestions to give it more flexibility, and avoid collision with other libraries.

  • Prefixing three-elements specific directives would avoid possible collisions with other libraries/frameworks.
  • Expose the function that registers directives so that you are able to put an alias/register another directive with the same function.
@hmans
Copy link
Owner

hmans commented Jun 23, 2021

Hi, and thanks for submitting this issue!

The good (?) news is that I too stumbled over this issue earlier, and am very interested in finding a good solution.

The bad news is that I've unfortunately not had the chance to work on three-elements for many months now, and am sort of out the loop. I would even go as far as saying that the future of the project is unclear at this point, at least with me as a maintainer. I'm hoping to find the time to make a sort of official announcement for this some time soon.

In the meantime, both of your suggestions sound sane. I would like to add that when I was still actively working on this library, I was intending to provide (or ask the community to provide) framework-specific bindings to make using three-elements super-straightforward (starting with providing type information, but also glue code where it makes sense.) A Svelte-specific binding would have the opportunity to wrap around and hide such a workaround.

I'm sorry if my reply to you isn't sounding too hopeful. I will be trying to find a new maintainer for the project (or pick up the mantle myself again, if time and work allow it) some time soon.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants