Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The result of BLSTM is better than Transformer? #39

Open
DiLiangWU opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

The result of BLSTM is better than Transformer? #39

DiLiangWU opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@DiLiangWU
Copy link

I run eend/egs/mini_librisppech/v1/run.sh and eend/egs/mini_librisppech/v1/local/run_blstm.sh, respectively. The result of run.sh (Transformer) is the same as RESULT.md (Final DER = 29.96%). However, the result of local/run_blstm.sh (BLSTM) is DER =17.02%, better than Transformer? Furthermore, I use CALLHOME corpora, the simulated mixtures are generated by SRE2008 and SWBD Cellular 1, the results also show that BLSTM is better than Transformer.

It is worth noting that a warning appears when i ran local/run_blstm.sh, as follows.

/workspace/EEND/tools/miniconda3/envs/eend/lib/python3.7/site-packages/chainer/iterators/multiprocess_iterator.py:629: UserWarning: Shared memory size is too small.
Please set shared_mem option for MultiprocessIterator.
Expect shared memory size: 4389780 bytes.
Actual shared memory size: 4171864 bytes.

I have no idea about this. And I'd like to know the results you got when running mini_librisppech/v1/local/run_blstm.sh.

Thank you very much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant