Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Witness validation #349

Closed
hernanponcedeleon opened this issue Jan 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Witness validation #349

hernanponcedeleon opened this issue Jan 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
SVCOMP Issues related to SVCOMP

Comments

@hernanponcedeleon
Copy link
Owner

Some tools (cseq, deagle, infer) generate "violation witnesses" even if they report that the program is safe. Some witnesses (deagle) do not have a violation state so we might avoid wrongly validating them by checking that the witness graph has a node labeled as "violation".
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
SVCOMP Issues related to SVCOMP
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hernanponcedeleon