Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Use a vanilla reference in net462 for System.Management #2821

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

jskeet
Copy link
Collaborator

@jskeet jskeet commented Aug 21, 2024

The lib/net462 folder in System.Management version 7.0.2 is empty, so this should be equivalent.

Addresses #2820.

The lib/net462 folder in System.Management version 7.0.2 is empty,
so this *should* be equivalent.
Copy link
Contributor

@amanda-tarafa amanda-tarafa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting...

@amanda-tarafa amanda-tarafa added the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Sep 5, 2024
@amanda-tarafa
Copy link
Contributor

Addind the do not merge label, I'm double checking this.

@amanda-tarafa amanda-tarafa removed the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Sep 5, 2024
@amanda-tarafa
Copy link
Contributor

I can see no reason why we had the versioned package reference vs. the .NET Framework reference. Also, I've ran several tests including from applications targetting both .NET Framework 4.6.2 and .NET Framework 4.8 with Google.Apis.Auth depending on the .NET Framework reference of System.Management and everything works fine.

This should be good to merge.

@jskeet jskeet merged commit e7c044f into googleapis:main Sep 10, 2024
5 checks passed
@jskeet jskeet deleted the framework-reference branch September 10, 2024 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants