-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Employee IP agreement for P.R.China #72
Comments
@0xDing thanks for sharing! A couple questions, if/when you/your team could answer:
|
In Chinese judicial practice, Employee IP agreement is usually only applicable to the Civil Code and not to criminal law. So, the agreement must contain an indemnified losses clause to be binding. And, As a country that applies the civil law system, general agreements in China need to be referred to as "Party A" and "Party B" As Party-Name Defined Terms. Typical employee IP agreements used in China generally require that any intellectual property rights arising from the use of equipment, premises, or other resources provided by the company belong to the company. For example, if you develop open source non-lethal mousetrap simulation software in office using a company owned computer and network, then the intellectual property rights are owned by the company. |
Thanks @0xDing. Regarding:
Could you point out which clauses accomplish this? 5-7? Reading through autotranslation, they look a bit scary for the employee (Party B), though perhaps autotranslation is not good, and I admittedly don't know what the baseline is.
Again skimming an autotranslation, it looks like it doesn't mention equipment, etc. Under Chinese law, does this mean the rights to non-job work go to the employee by default, even if performed on company equipment? Apologies for these naive questions, and thanks again for sharing your work here! |
Our legal team has draw up a version of BEIPA that applies to the laws of the People's Republic of China. And, we are willing to release to the public domain under CC0-1.0.
If anyone is interested in it, please click brickdoc/balanced-employee-ip-agreement for the full article.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: