-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stack.function
fail to match certain patterns
#73661
Comments
Auto-routing to @getsentry/product-owners-issues for triage ⏲️ |
In the "By In-app Exception Stack-trace" it does look like a grouping rule is being applied. see |
Thanks, but no, I do not what these frames to be considered in-app. They are not in-app frames. I only want them to be considered for the issue grouping, hence them having Note that the only frames included are the following:
since it matches the rule
But this issue is not related to this rule. This issue is related to the rule
Which ought to, but failed to, match against, eg.:
At least with this example we do have proof that the rule |
I'd also try either increasing or removing |
That's not relevant, the frames are not native and we have proof that the rules are already reaching past this point seeing as the UIApplicationMain frame has successfully matched. |
Hi @lhunath There's one algorithm that only considers in-app frames and another with all. In the first one (all frames) you will see that even |
Thanks! I have indeed found the The documentation specifically uses it in an example like this:
Suggesting that akin to all other actions, they are constrained by the matchers that come on the same line before them. However, I have discovered through experimentation that Regardless, even if so, that doesn't explain why the That probably should be either clearly documented, the example fixed, OR (better yet) the behaviour fixed such that the actual behaviour matches the documentation. Regardless, that is a separate issue to this one. |
I have modified the pattern in an attempt to find a working alternative and the following pattern does succeed at matching the expected frame:
|
Environment
SaaS (https://sentry.io/)
Steps to Reproduce
Expected Result
The frame is taken into account in the grouping logic on account of overriding the default grouping logic for the frame with the rule specified above.
Alternatively, if the pattern is invalid, a validation error when saving the pattern.
Actual Result
The frame is ignored on account of default grouping logic applying and not getting overridden by the rule above.
Product Area
Issues
Link
https://hubstaff.sentry.io/issues/5458344733/events/ecef19ff26e8443c9622a2a20b0e479d/
DSN
https://[email protected]/5277412
Version
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: