You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently have our own bespoke implementaion of something that approximates what FeatureGuardAttribute does, to disable parts of our SDK in trimming/AOT scenarios at runtime.
net9.0 introduces a FeatureGuardAttribute that we should look at leveraging instead, to make this more easily identifiable and readable.
Note
We can also potentially use the FeatureSwitchDefinitionAttribute to define parts of the SDK that can be trimmed, to help users reduce the size of their apps. I'm not sure how that would work though - would need to play around with it to check...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We currently have our own bespoke implementaion of something that approximates what FeatureGuardAttribute does, to disable parts of our SDK in trimming/AOT scenarios at runtime.
net9.0 introduces a
FeatureGuardAttribute
that we should look at leveraging instead, to make this more easily identifiable and readable.Note
We can also potentially use the FeatureSwitchDefinitionAttribute to define parts of the SDK that can be trimmed, to help users reduce the size of their apps. I'm not sure how that would work though - would need to play around with it to check...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: