You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm attempting to use Datadog's no data reporting to have a fallback for when the consumer is broken and stops reporting latency entirely, however it seems like on topics with little activity, we also stop reporting latency.
I suspect this is because Arroyo records this metric during commit.
Would it be possible to record a latency metric of 0 if there is no new offsets to process? This makes more sense to me than not recording a metric at all and would improve this use case.
Are there any reasons not to do this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I created some global monitors using the sentry arroyo latency and a fallback for sbc arroyo latency (since there are data team monitors as well).
I'm attempting to use Datadog's
no data
reporting to have a fallback for when the consumer is broken and stops reporting latency entirely, however it seems like on topics with little activity, we also stop reporting latency.I suspect this is because Arroyo records this metric during commit.
Would it be possible to record a latency metric of
0
if there is no new offsets to process? This makes more sense to me than not recording a metric at all and would improve this use case.Are there any reasons not to do this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: