We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Even though WebAssembly is not tightly bound to JS, it can relief its performance in any environment that has a JS engine (among others).
So: would it make sense to include a mention of WebAssembly? Especially since there's already a paragraph on asm.js, one of Wasm's "ancestors".
Chapter 5 of Async & Performance might be the right place (the asm.js paragraph is also in there): https://github.com/getify/You-Dont-Know-JS/blob/master/async%20%26%20performance/ch5.md
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixes issue getify#1435 Added a note about WebAssembly
e552173
Awesome!!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Even though WebAssembly is not tightly bound to JS, it can relief its performance in any environment that has a JS engine (among others).
So: would it make sense to include a mention of WebAssembly? Especially since there's already a paragraph on asm.js, one of Wasm's "ancestors".
Chapter 5 of Async & Performance might be the right place (the asm.js paragraph is also in there):
https://github.com/getify/You-Dont-Know-JS/blob/master/async%20%26%20performance/ch5.md
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: