Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

attributes and dimensions alignment vs featuretypes #232

Open
pvgenuchten opened this issue Sep 8, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

attributes and dimensions alignment vs featuretypes #232

pvgenuchten opened this issue Sep 8, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@pvgenuchten
Copy link
Contributor

attributes and dimensions share common aspects, such as unit/title/description min/max/avg (if numeric)

suggestion could be to merge both concepts?

Another aspect to consider in this area are featuretypes, for example the tables in a databases, or sheets in an excel (if the full database is considered a single dataset)

In stead of registering attributes directly on the content-info element, we would need to model them on a featuretype

contentinfo:
   featuretypes:
      - name: books
        identifier: #books
        attributes: 
           - name: title
             type: string
      - name: authors
        identifier: #authors
        attributes:
           - name: name
             type: string

Above approach matches with what is suggested in iso19110

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant