We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be useful to have an implementation of the CMB Dipole as a separate component in PySM.
I have a simple implementation here:
https://github.com/CMB-S4/s4mapbasedsims/blob/master/202102_design_tool_input/utils/create_cmb_solar_dipole.ipynb
However it would be nice to also have the option of activating the frequency dependent quadrupole, see implementation in toast:
https://github.com/hpc4cmb/toast/blob/ddae67de4154067d2317999f6cf6c31dd48ae047/src/toast/todmap/todmap_math.py#L552-L556
So we could have:
dip1
dip2
@keskitalo @giuspugl @brandonshensley @seclark any feedback?
No hurry, it will be some time before I can start working on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yes, please!
Thanks @zonca for addressing this! As i already commented here i am totally up to have the dipole as a separated component!
zonca
No branches or pull requests
It would be useful to have an implementation of the CMB Dipole as a separate component in PySM.
I have a simple implementation here:
https://github.com/CMB-S4/s4mapbasedsims/blob/master/202102_design_tool_input/utils/create_cmb_solar_dipole.ipynb
However it would be nice to also have the option of activating the frequency dependent quadrupole, see implementation in toast:
https://github.com/hpc4cmb/toast/blob/ddae67de4154067d2317999f6cf6c31dd48ae047/src/toast/todmap/todmap_math.py#L552-L556
So we could have:
dip1
: dipole without frequency dependence using NPIPE parameters 3366.6 ± 2.7 263.986 ± 0.035 48.247 ± 0.023 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.04997.pdfdip2
: same asdip1
with frequency dependent quadrupole correction@keskitalo @giuspugl @brandonshensley @seclark any feedback?
No hurry, it will be some time before I can start working on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: