[inbox] Principles (new and old) #876
Replies: 4 comments
-
Is there a chance that we can reduce the number of properties' mixed types as we discussed previously e.g.
I think most of the type mixing makes implementations struggle and, at the same time, I'm not sure whether it helps end-users or confuse them even more. E.g. if you see |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just wanted to share another thinking. I'm wondering if currently, the specs are too fragmented which makes it hard to understand Frictionless Data conceptually. I think in general we can have 4 core specs (+ numerous extra specs like FDP):
Also copying @lwinfree as we discussed earlier the specs understanding problem PS. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I definitely agree that it is confusing right now. From a technical decision, I'm not sure what is best, but I think either way, we should work to better document the distinction between the various specs to help remove that confusion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Actionable issues: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Reducing magic (june 2020)
Parsimony / Simplicty
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions