diff --git a/examples/Community Modeling/smetana/commscores_report.html b/examples/Community Modeling/smetana/commscores_report.html index 06d8f7cc..cfca21d0 100644 --- a/examples/Community Modeling/smetana/commscores_report.html +++ b/examples/Community Modeling/smetana/commscores_report.html @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ } } - @@ -43,12 +42,13 @@
The biomass yields are expressed in [gm/hr*(gm CDW)]
BSS_model2 | BIT | GYD | -RFC | +FC | @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@R2A_edition_003 | 0.84615 (33/39) | 0.84615 (33/39) | -22 | -5 (1) | -8 (4) | +21 | +3 (1) | +11 (3) | 0.60797 | 0.641026 | 0.692308 | @@ -93,25 +93,25 @@
---|
- | MRO_model1 | -MRO_model2 | -CIP | -MIP_model1 | -MIP_model2 | -PC | -BSS_model1 | -BSS_model2 | -GYD | -RFC | +MRO_model1 | +MRO_model2 | +CIP | +MIP_model1 | +MIP_model2 | +PC | +BSS_model1 | +BSS_model2 | +GYD | +FC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
model1 ++ model2 ___ Media | @@ -129,96 +129,98 @@|||||||||||||||||||||
Pseudomonas_sp._GM17_2511231006.fna.RAST.fbamodel ++ Sphingobium_sp._AP49_2512564014.fna.RAST.fbamodel in R2A_edition_003 | -0.846150 | -0.846150 | -22.000000 | -5.000000 | -8.000000 | -0.607970 | -0.641026 | -0.692308 | -0.162830 | -0.304200 | +Pseudomonas_sp._GM17_2511231006.fna.RAST.fbamodel ++ Sphingobium_sp._AP49_2512564014.fna.RAST.fbamodel in R2A_edition_003 | +0.846150 | +0.846150 | +21.000000 | +3.000000 | +11.000000 | +0.607970 | +0.641026 | +0.692308 | +0.162830 | +0.304200 |
- The FC score is calculated as the Jiccard Index of ontologies $O$ from either RAST or another annotation software available on KBase [2] -
+ The FC score is calculated as the Jiccard Index of ontologies $O$ from either RAST or another annotation software available on KBase [2] +
- The GYD score evaluates the disparity in growth rate between the isolated members -
+ The GYD score evaluates the disparity in growth rate between the isolated members +
- The CIP score quantifies the union of costless excreta CE (compounds that are excreted at maximal growth and therefore have no fitness cost associated with their excretion) in the isolated members -
+ The CIP score quantifies the union of costless excreta CE (compounds that are excreted at maximal growth and therefore have no fitness cost associated with their excretion) in the isolated members +
- The BIT score categorizes the member interaction into one of the classical descriptions -- competitive, amensalism, neutral, parasitism, commensalism, and mutualism -- based on relative growth of the members as isolates G1 versus in the community environment G1,comm -
+ The BIT score categorizes the member interaction into one of the classical descriptions -- competitive, amensalism, neutral, parasitism, commensalism, and mutualism -- based on relative growth of the members as isolates G1 versus in the community environment G1,comm +
- The Metabolic Resource Overlap (MRO) score is in the SMETANA suite and was published in several earlier studies as well, albeit with slight algorithmic variations. The MRO quantifies the fraction of a member's nutritional requirements, in a given media or the complete media by default, that overlap with the other member's nutritional requirements -
+ The Metabolic Resource Overlap (MRO) score is in the SMETANA suite and was published in several earlier studies as well, albeit with slight algorithmic variations. The MRO quantifies the fraction of a member's nutritional requirements, in a given media or the complete media by default, that overlap with the other member's nutritional requirements +
- The Metabolic Interaction Potential (MIP) score is also in the SMETANA suite and earlier studies. This score quantifies syntrophic exchanges between the members. Our curation computes the MIP as the difference in exchanged compounds versus transported compounds in the compartmentalized community model -
+ The Metabolic Interaction Potential (MIP) score is also in the SMETANA suite and earlier studies. This score quantifies syntrophic exchanges between the members. Our curation computes the MIP as the difference in exchanged compounds versus transported compounds in the compartmentalized community model +
- The Potential Cooperation (PC) score quantifies the net effect of co-growth relative to isolate growth, and in our curation is determined as the ratio of community growth to the sum of isolated member growths -
+ The Potential Cooperation (PC) score quantifies the net effect of co-growth relative to isolate growth, and in our curation is determined as the ratio of community growth to the sum of isolated member growths +
- The Biosynthetic Support Score (BSS) score quantifies the capacity of a member to parasitize another member by topologically evaluating the proportion of a member's nutritional requirements that are in the other member's cytoplasmic metabolites -
+ The Biosynthetic Support Score (BSS) score quantifies the capacity of a member to parasitize another member by topologically evaluating the proportion of a member's nutritional requirements that are in the other member's cytoplasmic metabolites +