Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Onboard M7a as a supported instance #4938

Open
JackThomson2 opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Onboard M7a as a supported instance #4938

JackThomson2 opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@JackThomson2
Labels
Priority: Low Indicates that an issue or pull request should be resolved behind issues or pull requests labelled ` Roadmap: Tracked Items tracked on the roadmap project. Status: WIP Indicates that an issue is currently being worked on or triaged

Comments

@JackThomson2
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Onboard the M7a 4th Generation AMD EPYC as a new instance in our CI for testing.

This will add the instance to our testing platforms and run CI testing against this on Buildkite PR steps and the performance A/B tests

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI passes
  • Fix failing tests new instance
@JackThomson2 JackThomson2 added Priority: Low Indicates that an issue or pull request should be resolved behind issues or pull requests labelled ` Roadmap: Tracked Items tracked on the roadmap project. labels Dec 2, 2024
@JackThomson2 JackThomson2 self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
@JackThomson2 JackThomson2 moved this to We're Working On It in Firecracker Roadmap Dec 2, 2024
@JackThomson2 JackThomson2 changed the title [CI] Onboard M7a as a supported instance Onboard M7a as a supported instance Dec 4, 2024
@roypat roypat added the Status: WIP Indicates that an issue is currently being worked on or triaged label Dec 9, 2024
@hpvd
Copy link

hpvd commented Dec 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

just for understanding:
is this about adding a non bare metal instance?

if so, how do one deal with the circumstance described below:

What are the possibilities to do so without having to rely on daxx expensive aws bare metal instances?
Of course there are some cheap, virtualized offers which should make nested kvm possible -at the first sight.
-> but as far as I know this is not suitable for longer running production use cases because these instances could be auto-live-migrated at anytime which will break the instance....

see #4950

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@JackThomson2 JackThomson2

Labels
Priority: Low Indicates that an issue or pull request should be resolved behind issues or pull requests labelled ` Roadmap: Tracked Items tracked on the roadmap project. Status: WIP Indicates that an issue is currently being worked on or triaged
Projects
Firecracker Roadmap
Status: We're Working On It
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@hpvd @JackThomson2 @roypat