-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
📑 Feature Request: Extensions for updated test script #1228
Comments
|
Thanks @kurysauce |
Update |
This makes sense. Thanks @kurysauce |
Hi @DhanshreeA and @miquelduranfrigola I am marking this as "on-hold" until we have a clear roadmap for Ersilia CLI commands |
Hi @DhanshreeA @Abellegese has been working on the test script right? so is this on hold still or undergoing? If so, which issues from the original list have been tackled? Thanks |
Yes @GemmaTuron this addressed in depth in new test pipeline including the playground. Currently it does not give list of packages with version. Thats only it, if its important will update to do that. |
Hi @Abellegese Thanks, please give more details and/or a link to the documentation before we can close this issue. I need more info to understand the pipeline. |
Hi @GemmaTuron yes I have a doc for playground. For model tester, I will upload it and let you know. |
I do have the docs, revise a bit and upload it to gitbook. |
So this issue also has been addressed in the following cases:
|
Hi @GemmaTuron the docs for model tester has been uploaded. You may check it. |
Describe your feature request.
After developing the updated
test.py
command for Ersilia #1203 , I believe having a detailed report for model contributors and users would be helpful in debugging and understanding the models in context.The testing report summary, along with including the metrics measured in the
test.py
command should also include the following (not an exhaustive list):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: