You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
options{// ...header: ['checkAll','uncheckAll'],// (false | string | array) False, custom string or array indicating which links to show in the header & in what order.// ...}
What is the expected behavior?
options{// ...header: ['checkAll','uncheckAll','checkInvert'],// (false | string | array) False, custom string or array indicating which links to show in the header & in what order.// ...}
when clicking Check Invert, as it's called, uncheck checked items and check uncheked items.
If you are requesting a new or changed feature, please provide a rationale
Sorry if this was already requested, but as I see on the code there isn't a way to do it.
It would be useful for many applications, e.g., if the multiselection is a filter and you need to do a quick filtering invertion you wouldn't need to uncheck all and recheck the previously unchecked or, viceversa, check all to to uncheck the previously checked.
Will you submit a corresponding Pull Request to fix the bug or implement the feature?
idk if this applies
Please tell us about your setup
Version: 3.0.1
Browser: Edge
Other frameworks in use: UI & Finger
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This functionality already exists in the widget. However, it is referred to as flip, not invert. I know because I implemented it. Please look at the wiki for details on it.
What is the current behavior?
What is the expected behavior?
when clicking
Check Invert
, as it's called, uncheck checked items and check uncheked items.If you are requesting a new or changed feature, please provide a rationale
Sorry if this was already requested, but as I see on the code there isn't a way to do it.
It would be useful for many applications, e.g., if the multiselection is a filter and you need to do a quick filtering invertion you wouldn't need to uncheck all and recheck the previously unchecked or, viceversa, check all to to uncheck the previously checked.
Will you submit a corresponding Pull Request to fix the bug or implement the feature?
idk if this applies
Please tell us about your setup
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: