You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some IPs might require a lot of stuff intended for config.json that will make them integrate properly. An example is ROUTING_OBSTRUCTIONS (which should instead be GRT_OBS for OpenLane 1) which might not otherwise be obvious to the user:
For OL1 & OL2, can these be managed another way, instead of via explicit config.json entries? e.g. Keepouts in GDS or LEF, or some sort of dynamic config?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
amm-efabless
changed the title
Standardize ROUTING_OBSTRUCTIONS for IPs
Standardize ROUTING_OBSTRUCTIONS (or GRT_OBS for OL1) for IPs
May 9, 2024
Some IPs might require a lot of stuff intended for
config.json
that will make them integrate properly. An example isROUTING_OBSTRUCTIONS
(which should instead beGRT_OBS
for OpenLane 1) which might not otherwise be obvious to the user:caravel_user_sram/openlane/SRAM_1024x32/config.json
Lines 60 to 66 in 781c046
For OL1 & OL2, can these be managed another way, instead of via explicit
config.json
entries? e.g. Keepouts in GDS or LEF, or some sort of dynamic config?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: