-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Building custom containers #126
Comments
@RolfHut FYI |
In a previous version (v0.1.2) we had a Ansible role to install Docker that could be resurrected. |
From a security perspective I would like to keep Docker away from the VM. We could also use |
This still builds from a container image on dockerhub, right? The point of this issue is that you should be able to build/obtain a singularity/apptainer image without needing docker/dockerhub. |
Currently the workflow for adding model (version)s to the eWaterCycle platform is (also see eWaterCycle/ewatercycle#294)
Step 3 and 4 can be combined by building from a local docker image, but it would be even better if we didn't need to convert between docker and singularity altogether.
One way to achieve this is to make docker available on the default infra
Another option is to switch from dockerfiles to something singularity understands (singularity definition file?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: