-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 968
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(search_family): Add Aggregator class #4290
Open
BagritsevichStepan
wants to merge
7
commits into
dragonflydb:main
Choose a base branch
from
BagritsevichStepan:df.search/refactor-aggregator-logic
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6208b7c
refactor(search_family): Add Aggregator class
BagritsevichStepan 4cc82a6
fix(aggregator_test): Fix tests failing
BagritsevichStepan 1e30ca5
refactor: address comments
BagritsevichStepan 814965b
refactor: Restore the previous comment
BagritsevichStepan 51c70c7
refactor: address comments 2
BagritsevichStepan 34ea3c7
refactor: address comments 3
BagritsevichStepan 13790de
fix(aggregator): Simplify comparator for the case when one of the val…
BagritsevichStepan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do we return true if elements are equal for less operator? As I understand you could take previous implementation and return something like "res != descending"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it makes sense to return. But just to note, we are not guaranteeing any strict ordering in the result when elements are equal. This is because the final order also depends on the initial distribution of keys across shards (results from shards are joined into one vector, and then a sort is performed on this array).descending
hereSo, it is not a "stable" sort, meaning that the initial order of the data is influenced by the key distribution across shards, which may give the user the impression of an unstable sort
Upd.: After discussion, it was decided to return
false
if the elements are equal.