-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 968
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(codeql): Adds codeql action #4034
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hello @BLANKatGITHUB ! Are you planning to work on this PR? |
I think the workflow is failing because the default codeql is on this repo for advanced codeql using workflow it should have been disabled. |
You can accept this pr by disabling the default codeql or close this pr and keep using the default codeql, it depends on you. |
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
hmm, it passed |
tests/codeql/build.sh
Outdated
autoconf-archive libtool cmake g++ libzstd-dev bison libxml2-dev | ||
|
||
# Clone the Dragonfly repository | ||
git clone --recursive https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly && cd dragonfly |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do you need to clone the directory? does not it defeat the purpose of checking a PR?
seems that steps
https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly/pull/4034/files#diff-12783128521e452af0cfac94b99b8d250413c516ec71fe6d97dbea666ff7ba27R32-R33
should suffice
@BLANKatGITHUB thanks. Gave a comment.
see ci.yml for example. And then use the checked out repo to build the finary. |
Signed-off-by: Blanky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Blanky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Blanky <[email protected]>
It looks good now. |
I think the code is fine now |
Adds codeql action to build the project from scratch and perform code anaylsis for security vulnerabilities.
Fixes #4033