Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support to Firefox 57 #269

Open
peylight opened this issue Oct 29, 2017 · 19 comments
Open

Add support to Firefox 57 #269

peylight opened this issue Oct 29, 2017 · 19 comments

Comments

@peylight
Copy link

Your DownThemAll! and Browser Version and Language and Operating System

Firefox 57 Developer Edition
English
Windows 10

Expected Behavior

Support this version

Actual Behavior

Not support this version

Steps To Reproduce

Additional info such as log extracts

Please enable Diagnostic Logging in the Privacy tab of the DownThemAll! preferences and either copy/paste essential part of the log or attach the entire log. Please note that the log may include sentitive information which you have to remove prior to posting it!

@Xmetalfanx
Copy link

As seen on downthemall/downthemall#256

http://www.downthemall.net/re-downthemall-and-webextensions-or-why-why-i-am-done-with-mozilla/

THOUGH better news http://www.downthemall.net/progress/

@regs01
Copy link

regs01 commented Nov 15, 2017

Making WebExtension for Chrome and Edge would be a good lesson for mozilla

@josephj11
Copy link

I want it for Vivaldi (based on Chromium)!

Firefox has consistently broken features I loved ever since version 4. Vivaldi is the opposite!
Sometimes when they add a new feature I wanted, it's actually better than what I wanted.

Right now, I can wait a little bit for DTA because Flashgot, which I use to trigger DTA, is broken too!

Flashgot/DTA is almost the only reason I still use Firefox. That combination is light years ahead of any similar software that I'm aware of.

@Timi7007
Copy link

Just to keep this updated: http://www.downthemall.net/delays/

@EMBBlaster
Copy link

Should be closed as duplicate of issue #240.

@rhadamanthe
Copy link

Hi.

Does anyone know where is located the source code for DTA lite? I have not seen any branch here.
I have started to work on a web extension in replacement of Image Host Grabber. And Firefox's new download API is so limited that I would like to give a hand on DTA. The idea would be to make a greater download API (with resume, queue persistence, etc) that other web extensions might use too.

@bperel
Copy link

bperel commented Dec 15, 2017

I would be interested to know where the source code of DTA lite is as well, even if it isn't stable yet

@xdhmoore
Copy link

I would as well.

@Xmetalfanx
Copy link

I think (I have no idea the roadmap for this but it is on Github) using Waterfox for now if you can is the way to go with the original extension.

I may have said it already and forgot but (@ the original dev) I think that so many people appreciate and love the project that even if you "no longer want" to develop the extension, there may be talented people out there that could (even if 100% incomplete ATM with DTA lite) pick up the project and maybe get your "blessing" to "take over" DTA where its not "all on you". ... or at least where you are 100% still in "charge" of DTA but they can contribute with PR's and such to chip-in on the effort.

@MartinX3
Copy link

MartinX3 commented Mar 2, 2018

Basilisk Browser (Palemoon on Firefox v52 Base) is a solution.

@g-i-o-r-g-i-o
Copy link

I hope that this comes soon...

@g-i-o-r-g-i-o
Copy link

g-i-o-r-g-i-o commented May 20, 2018

...

@Xmetalfanx
Copy link

I hate to get off topic but even if its a good project ... I start getting iffy about using a fork of a fork of a fork type of things ... I mean what is the advantage of say "Pale Moon on an updated Firefox base" (compared to ACTUAL Pale Moon" vs something like Waterfox which IIRC is a fork of FF and you eliminate a "middle man fork" so to speak.

AND OF COURSE I realize I am saying this on github lol

@Tobias004
Copy link

DTH is DEAD. Just look at the commits, or wait forever!

@Anutrix
Copy link

Anutrix commented Mar 1, 2019

Why won't the developer reply or post something on his website?

@josephj11
Copy link

@Anutrix I guess no point in beating a dead horse. The way Firefox/Mozilla has treated extension authors got many of them demoralized enough to quit long before quantum nuked almost all of them.

@Xmetalfanx
Copy link

they were giving warnings for months (that doesn't mean it's easy for some addons to be completely redone ... look HOW DIFFERENT Noscript is now) .... I have just expected this is a dead project and the dev has moved on ... would expect a "if someone wants to officially take over the project" message but .. whatever

@MartinX3
Copy link

MartinX3 commented Mar 1, 2019

Yes. A missing communication is very very very impolite.

@xdhmoore
Copy link

xdhmoore commented Mar 1, 2019

I agree it would be nice to hear something, but in the end, it's a bunch of free work someone did as a gift to the community. I don't think they are under any obligation to follow up if they don't have time any more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests