Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: Setting the area density according to SI for a thickness seems to not convert value #290

Open
Dervis-vL opened this issue Oct 2, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Existing feature isn't working properly

Comments

@Dervis-vL
Copy link

Describe the bug
To set the area density variable (as seen on the printscreen) to a thickness via the webservice with the SI unit N/m^2 does not seem to convert it to kg/m^2 (see GUI on printscreen).

We provided the value 13441.67 [N/m^2] and expect the value 1344.167 [kg/m^2] in the GUI (after the model is saved).

To Reproduce
The following call is made:

Thickness.StiffnessMatrix(
                no = self._thickness_count,
                name = thickness_name,
                material_no = material_num,
                stiffness_matrix= stiffness_matrix,
                consideration_of_self_weight = [ThicknessStiffnessMatrixSelfWeightDefinitionType.SELF_WEIGHT_DEFINITION_TYPE_DEFINED_VIA_FICTITIOUS_THICKNESS_AND_AREA_DENSITY, fictitious_thickness, area_density]
            )

Expected behavior
We provided the value 13441.67 [N/m^2] and expect the value 1344.167 [kg/m^2] in the GUI (after the model is saved).

Screenshots

Area density

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • Version of WIN10 OS
  • Version of RFEM6.03.00045
  • Version of tool / rfem package 1.17
@Dervis-vL Dervis-vL added the bug Existing feature isn't working properly label Oct 2, 2023
@Sacek073
Copy link
Contributor

Sacek073 commented Nov 3, 2023

Hi @Dervis-vL,
thank you for noticing this. It'll be investigated and if this beahviour is a bug it'll be corrected.

@Sacek073 Sacek073 self-assigned this Nov 3, 2023
@Sacek073
Copy link
Contributor

Sacek073 commented Nov 7, 2023

The bug was reported (#139798). Thank you.

@Dervis-vL
Copy link
Author

Hi!

I am curious to hear if progress on this issue has been made.

@OndraMichal OndraMichal assigned OndraMichal and unassigned Sacek073 Jan 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Existing feature isn't working properly
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

3 participants