Pip corpus

[jfioasd]

Similar to this issue, I decided to run Lynn's method on Pip answers.

Query used. Code used is same as Vyxal's corpus. Results:

2-graphs:
  66 $+
  51 a@
  50 aR
  47 #a
  46 RV
  42 ++
  39 }M
  38 FI
  38 _M
  36 (a
  36 a)
  34 @>
  33 a}
  33 \,
  32 ,a
  32 sX
  32 Na
  30 Ma
  30 a-
  30 TB
  28 +1
  28 Xa
  27 Fi
  25 a^
  25 .'
  24 MX
  24 @?
  23 {Y
  23 :a
  22 %2

3-graphs:
  16 _FI
  15 ,#a
  15 \,a
  13 Fi,
  13 ++i
  13 $+a
  12 TBa
  12 a}M
  10 a//
  10 $+(
   9 RVa
   9 RPy
   9 ($+
   8 i+:
   8 (.)
   8 R+X
   8 FIa
   8 L#a
   8 #a)
   7 aR+
   7 +XD
   7 _Na
   7 aR`
   7 X#a
   7 Xa-
   7 a^'
   7 RVy
   7 A*a
   7 POa
   6 #a{

4-graphs:
   7 aR+X
   6 `(.)
   5 Fi,#
   5 i,#a
   5 ,#a{
   5 (.)\
   5 .)\1
   5 N_FI
   5 MX#*
   5 "Hel
   5 Hell
   5 ello
   5 ,#a)
   4 Fi,a
   4 R+XD
   4 a//b
   4 1NTB
   4 -#_.
   4  Wor
   4 Worl
   4 orld
   4 .@>_
   4 a%,a
   4 <<<<
   4 ====
   4 >>>>
   4 ,Non
   4 None
   3 "Goo
   3 Good

[dloscutoff]

Interesting! The query you used was excluding answers with flags in the header (like "Pip -p, XX bytes"); here is an updated version that should catch most of the Pip answers and exclude most of the false positives.