We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
While creating an alias
{ "group name": { "token name": { "$value": 1234, "$type": "number" } }, "alias name": { "$value": "{group name.token name}" } }
I think is more explicit to specify an alias type
{ "group name": { "token name": { "$value": 1234, "$type": "number" } }, "alias name": { "$value": "{group name.token name}", "$type": "alias" } }
Improving readability, and simplifying the implementation of design/translation/documentation tools
It will also make the following rule more clear
"If no explicit type has been set for a token, tools MUST consider the token invalid and not attempt to infer any other type from the value."
And prevent breaking #139
Since a token without type may be an alias, and therefore, not invalid
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
While creating an alias
I think is more explicit to specify an alias type
Improving readability, and simplifying the implementation of design/translation/documentation tools
It will also make the following rule more clear
"If no explicit type has been set for a token, tools MUST consider the token invalid and not attempt to infer any other type from the value."
And prevent breaking #139
Since a token without type may be an alias, and therefore, not invalid
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: