Discussion about Pyright for Static Type Checking in CI / Locally #2266
Closed
C-Loftus
started this conversation in
Architectural decision record
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Would you mind opening a draft PR with the lenient config? I think it will be easier to see what's going on that way Re less lenient config, looks like nearly all of the spurious errors are of the form |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Closing this in favor of the draft PR |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Discussed with Pokey at Cursorless meetup last weekend about Pyright CI. Posting this here as a discussion to evaluate if Pyright is useful for Cursorless in its CI pipeline. Wanted to align at a high level about preferences before creating any PRs.
Upside for Pyright integration
Downside for Pyright integration
reportGeneralTypeIssues
to get rid of it.Pyright Output with Following Config
Pyright output with the Following Config (Click me)
Pyright Config with a more lenient config
Pyright output with a lenient Config (Click me)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions