You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The following requirements have not meet:
[profile: RO-Crate Metadata Specification 1.1]
[ ro-crate-1.1.8 ]: RO-Crate Root Data Entity REQUIRED properties
The Root Data Entity MUST have a name, description, license and datePublished
Failed checks
[ MUST 8.3 ] Root Data Entity: `licence` property:
Check if the Root Data Entity includes a license property (as specified by schema.org) to provide information about the
license of the dataset.
Detected issues
- [Violation on <./>]: The Root Data Entity MUST have a `license` property (as specified by schema.org).
SHOULD link to a Contextual Entity in the RO-Crate Metadata File with a name and description.
MAY have a URI (eg for Creative Commons or Open Source licenses).
MAY, if necessary be a textual description of how the RO-Crate may be used.
We have already discussed this issue in #14, where @elichad pointed out that, according to the specification, the properties you mentioned are REQUIRED and not merely RECOMMENDED. What is recommended (SHOULD) is solely the value of these properties, while their presence is mandatory.
You can also find an example of a minimal RO-Crate in the specifications, which illustrates that these properties must be present.
According to https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/specification/1.1/root-data-entity.html#direct-properties-of-the-root-data-entity,
name
,license
,datePublished
anddescription
are SHOULD and not MUST properties.Currently the rocrate-validator reports these as MUST properties and validation fails, e.g. for an eln-file from RSPace with:
See also the discussion in this issue: TheELNConsortium/TheELNFileFormat#88
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: