You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There have already been a couple of Greek issues, but there's two more small things I want to bring to attention.
The thing which I stumbled upon was that the θ (normal theta) character looks too much like a zero to me -- its width is pretty much the same, and the "horizontal" bar is slightly diagonal, which my brain parses as a diagonal stroke as in some typewriter fonts' zeros. This doesn't happen when the stroke is completely horizontal. Perhaps also the total width and the extent above the M-height play a role. Is that just me? And in certain resolutions, it is rendered as completely horizontal, which I find much clearer:
And then, when I investigated the whole alphabet, I got the impression that the blackness of the non-var epsilon is noticeably higher than that of the rest:
(Screenshots are from Emacs under Ubuntu.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ah, with your resolution I see now that the bar is actually a wave, in which case the distinction is much more prominent. Then it's not even me, but my renderer + display :P
One more thing: at small sizes, the greek letters start getting a smaller, at least optically:
Once the glyph shapes are extracted from the file, everything about how they're displayed varies from OS to OS and application to application! It certainly looks like Emacs is opinionated when it comes to displaying Greek text, though - this is the way it looks normally:
Unfortunately I don't test on emacs (or most other text editors really - last time I tried emacs I had trouble exiting... 😄
There have already been a couple of Greek issues, but there's two more small things I want to bring to attention.
The thing which I stumbled upon was that the θ (normal theta) character looks too much like a zero to me -- its width is pretty much the same, and the "horizontal" bar is slightly diagonal, which my brain parses as a diagonal stroke as in some typewriter fonts' zeros. This doesn't happen when the stroke is completely horizontal. Perhaps also the total width and the extent above the M-height play a role. Is that just me? And in certain resolutions, it is rendered as completely horizontal, which I find much clearer:
And then, when I investigated the whole alphabet, I got the impression that the blackness of the non-var epsilon is noticeably higher than that of the rest:
(Screenshots are from Emacs under Ubuntu.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: