-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
state monad using record as a state #48
Labels
Comments
Interesting. Coq shouldn't care about the record vs the pair, so a universe problem is possible, though I would highly doubt it, you aren't doing anything interesting with universes. Can you print the relevant universes? |
Changing definition of
Gives the following error:
|
vzaliva
added a commit
to vzaliva/helix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2018
vzaliva
added a commit
to vzaliva/helix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2018
This reverts commit 31277b9.
This seems to be fixed by making |
Is this still an issue? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I am observing a strange error when using ExtLib. I am unsure if it is a bug or some sort of limitation, related to universes. In short, I've modified
examples/StateGame.v
ExtLib example, changing state type fromDefinition GameState: Type := (prod bool Z)
withRecord GameState : Type := mkGameState {on:bool; score:Z}.
. This lead to the following error message:At first glance
MonadState_state
instance should satisfy this constraint, but there is universe mismatch.The full example is enclosed below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: