Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Suggestion - Increase line width as as radius increases #59

Open
person678 opened this issue Nov 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Feature Suggestion - Increase line width as as radius increases #59

person678 opened this issue Nov 12, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@person678
Copy link

person678 commented Nov 12, 2023

I'm currently performing research for my master's thesis which will involve building a PCB motor. I've come across a paper which illustrates the impact of unequal line width for radial windings. The gist of the idea is that there is a lot of wasted PCB area as the trace heads towards the outer radius, so you can widen the conductor as it approaches the outer edge to increase current density, etc.
You can see what I mean here - thicker lines to fill in the big gaps:

CleanShot 2023-11-12 at 12 28 04@2x

I'm not sure if KiCad has support for tapering a line's width - I imagine you would probably need to split those lines into small segments and increase the width of each one gradually?

@cooked
Copy link
Owner

cooked commented Nov 13, 2023

Hi @person678,
I see your point. Can you share a reference to the paper?

@person678
Copy link
Author

person678 commented Nov 13, 2023

This is the first paper. The results are a bit difficult to interpret but I believe this is the key graph:
image

The context here is a PCB stator generator being ran at a given speed (x axis). The output power for a given speed appears to be significantly better for the tapered trace. There is another graph which suggests the eddy current loss is much higher for the tapered trace, which seems counter-intuitive, but the graph suggests this doesn't counteract performance gains? I do wonder if they got the copper loss figures back to front...

This other paper (which references the first) investigates tapered traces for a parallel design. They show significantly reduced copper loss (17%!) and resistance, though lower inductance too. The ones to compare are "Parallel" and "UEW".

CleanShot 2023-11-13 at 11 56 00

The UEW (tapered trace) also displayed much lower temperature than the others.
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants