Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Faster extraction / linking #122

Open
2 tasks done
jaimergp opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks done

Faster extraction / linking #122

jaimergp opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
type::feature request for a new feature or capability

Comments

@jaimergp
Copy link
Collaborator

Checklist

  • I added a descriptive title
  • I searched open requests and couldn't find a duplicate

What is the idea?

The rattler folks have been making a lot of progress on this front, as evidenced in this Zulip thread.

I wonder if we could do one of the following things:

  • Reuse some of those tricks and port them over to our logic
  • Bundle py-rattler too and reuse their functions here

Why is this needed?

Extraction and linking are the costliest steps of any installation. Any performance improvements here would be appreciated in thousands of daily CI runs and local installations.

What should happen?

Measurable improvements in installation times with no penalty in robustness.

Additional Context

No response

@jaimergp jaimergp added the type::feature request for a new feature or capability label Dec 20, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 New in 🧭 Planning Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type::feature request for a new feature or capability
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant