-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add helper functions to print to log/print to stderr #331
Comments
Great idea. To make these helper functions available across modules. We may have to make used a common module that gets nested in each module. A similar proposal is #312 |
I’ve been thinking about this on and off myself. A common module is definitely one option, but I’ve also been entertaining the idea of using code-gen to bundle the common code into all modules. Not sure what would be the best approach. EDIT: I say code-gen, but it could just as well be done as built-time transformation. |
Yes. Generated code is fine too. The idea is to reduce fragmentation and optimize the UX. |
@matifali I've been thinking about how to solve this from a couple of perspectives:
Essentially, this is what I've come up with: resource "coder_script" "vscode-web" {
script = templatefile("${path.module}/script.tftpl", {
LOADER: "/usr/bin/env bash",
LIB: file("${path.module}/lib.sh"),
RUN: file("${path.module}/run.sh"),
VARS: templatefile("${path.module}/vars.tftpl", {
PORT : var.port,
LOG_PATH : var.log_path,
INSTALL_PREFIX : var.install_prefix,
EXTENSIONS : join(",", var.extensions),
TELEMETRY_LEVEL : var.telemetry_level,
// This is necessary otherwise the quotes are stripped!
SETTINGS : replace(jsonencode(var.settings), "\"", "\\\""),
OFFLINE : var.offline,
USE_CACHED : var.use_cached,
EXTENSIONS_DIR : var.extensions_dir,
FOLDER : var.folder,
AUTO_INSTALL_EXTENSIONS : var.auto_install_extensions,
}),
})
} Where:
#!${LOADER}
# lib.sh
touch "$CODER_SCRIPT_DATA_DIR/lib.sh"
${LIB}
# vars.tftpl
touch "$CODER_SCRIPT_DATA_DIR/vars.tftpl"
${VARS}
# run.sh
${RUN} (The
#!/bin/sh
log() { echo "$@" }
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# shellcheck source=vscode-web/lib.sh
. "${CODER_SCRIPT_DATA_DIR}/lib.sh"
# shellcheck source=vscode-web/vars.tftpl
. "${CODER_SCRIPT_DATA_DIR}/vars.tftpl"
run_vscode_web() {
log running... # log from lib.sh
# ...
#!/usr/bin/env sh
# Code generated by [insert name]. DO NOT EDIT.
# shellcheck disable=SC2269
PORT="${PORT}" # type: number, default: 13338, description: The port to run VS Code Web on.
LOG_PATH="${LOG_PATH}" # ...
INSTALL_PREFIX="${INSTALL_PREFIX}"
EXTENSIONS="${EXTENSIONS}"
TELEMETRY_LEVEL="${TELEMETRY_LEVEL}"
SETTINGS="${SETTINGS}"
OFFLINE="${OFFLINE}"
USE_CACHED="${USE_CACHED}"
EXTENSIONS_DIR="${EXTENSIONS_DIR}"
FOLDER="${FOLDER}"
AUTO_INSTALL_EXTENSIONS="${AUTO_INSTALL_EXTENSIONS}" End result (coder script): #!/usr/bin/env bash
# lib.sh
touch "$CODER_SCRIPT_DATA_DIR/lib.sh"
#!/bin/sh
log() { echo "$@" }
# vars.tftpl
touch "$CODER_SCRIPT_DATA_DIR/vars.tftpl"
#!/usr/bin/env sh
# Code generated by [insert name]. DO NOT EDIT.
# shellcheck disable=SC2269
PORT="${PORT}" # type: number, default: 13338, description: The port to run VS Code Web on.
LOG_PATH="${LOG_PATH}" # ...
INSTALL_PREFIX="${INSTALL_PREFIX}"
EXTENSIONS="${EXTENSIONS}"
TELEMETRY_LEVEL="${TELEMETRY_LEVEL}"
SETTINGS="${SETTINGS}"
OFFLINE="${OFFLINE}"
USE_CACHED="${USE_CACHED}"
EXTENSIONS_DIR="${EXTENSIONS_DIR}"
FOLDER="${FOLDER}"
AUTO_INSTALL_EXTENSIONS="${AUTO_INSTALL_EXTENSIONS}"
# run.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# shellcheck source=vscode-web/lib.sh
. "${CODER_SCRIPT_DATA_DIR}/lib.sh"
# shellcheck source=vscode-web/vars.tftpl
. "${CODER_SCRIPT_DATA_DIR}/vars.tftpl"
run_vscode_web() {
log running... # log from lib.sh
# ... Not sure if this will make it hard to understand the project structure and how/where to contribute. I have some other ideas too, but that requires introducing a pre-filter for Also, it'd be possible to combine |
This is an exciting approach and will greatly improve quality and maintenance. and if we can automate it with a script like |
As we move over to the refactored registry and start versioning each module individually, I think this would be a good addition. Let me know if you want to work on this in the next cycle. Happy to sync on this to discuss it further. What is important for me is to,
|
While reviewing #329 I noticed we didn't print any errors to stderr. I suggest we add helper functions for this:
Then use them where appropriate:
// cc @matifali
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: