Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use chainer.Sequential instead of chainerrl.links.Sequence #303

Open
muupan opened this issue Sep 2, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Use chainer.Sequential instead of chainerrl.links.Sequence #303

muupan opened this issue Sep 2, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
prio:low

Comments

@muupan
Copy link
Member

muupan commented Sep 2, 2018 •
edited
Loading

This change requires dropping Chainer v2 support. Does anyone still need it?
@muupan muupan added the prio:low label Oct 9, 2018
@muupan
Copy link
Member Author

muupan commented Apr 8, 2019

Chainer v2 support has been dropped.

chainerrl.links.Sequence is designed to work with an old stateful recurrent interface, so we need to switch to a new stateless recurrent interface #431 to deprecate it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
prio:low
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@muupan