-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multiple Feature Types in one CF file #231
Comments
Hello @gaochen-larc, thanks for raising this question, which has been discussed a few times over the years. Perhaps now is the time for us to act? You are quite right - at present a netCDF dataset can contain at most one My thoughts are that modifying the conventions to allow different data variables in the same dataset to have different feature types is possible. Allowing the Anyway, I'd be happy to discuss this further to see if we can solve this. All the best, |
Thank you, David! Maybe we should look into a few cases and see if we are doing reasonable things or how should we improve, e.g., adding attributes or other things... Here is the link: https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/cpex.2022. Could you please take a look at the .nc files under different names if you have time. Also, we have a more complicated case. We may have crossed the line... In this case, we used "lat", "lon" in different groups as they different dimensions, Here is the example (I can email you the small sample file if it is more convenient): netcdf file:/D:/CPEX-CV/APR3/cpexcv-APR3_t08.nc {
group: lores {
} group: hi2lo {
} // global attributes: |
It is a common practice to report lidar measurements of vertical profiles and vertically integrated quantity in the same file. For example, the file will contain vertical profile of aerosol extinction and aerosol optical depth (AOD). For airborne sampling, the FeatureType for extinction profile is trajectoryProfile. The AOD is timeSeriesProfile. Sample files can be found at: https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/cpex.2022#NEHRIR.AMIN/. This practice appears inconsistent with the recent version of the CF convention: "When using these new conventions, the features contained within a collection must always be of the same type; and all the collections in a CF file must be of the same feature type." However, this type of files is convenient for the researchers in the subject area, Could someone to clarify how multiple FeatureTypes in a CF file would cause problems? Or maybe this is not a correct interpretation of the CF conventions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: