You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When varying the number of harmonics (nharm) in function lomb_scargle_model(), the computed model can showcase some instabilities for high nharmonics, not in a regular pattern though (see attached file).
Must specify that these instabilities (when changing nharm) do not appear for all light-curves tested, but still noticed for some data.
In the following, one identified case is reported.
Possible source of error
In real astronomical TS, the flux/mags values would refer to negative values or a different numerical precision that could possibly be the source of underflow/overflow within the optimization part (refine_psd, get_eigs) in _lomb_scargle.h and _eigs.h
Possible solution
normalize the signal before fitting the lomb_scargle (temporary solution?)
As a result, the computed model would be a normalized version of the usual model (=computed on initial mag/flux measurements).
Proposition
within cesium.features.lomb_scargle.lomb_scargle_model.py :
compute internally the normalization of the lc = signal entry in functions fit_lomb_scargle() and lomb_scargle_model()
compute the lomb_scargle model using fit_lomb_scargle() and _lomb_scargle.h. Output: normalized fitted model
compute adjustments (*scale and +mean) to provide the model on initial flux/mags
Attached files
displays of initial light_curve superimposed with the estimated trend from cesium_fit for a varying nharm.
The cesium_period is specified for each run.
When computing the cesium model on normalized data, no instabilities are detected.
snippet:
from cesium.features.lomb_scargle import lomb_scargle_model
lc ## cesium TS object from MACHO, object_name='6.6692.9', red band
times = lc.time.copy(); mags = lc.measurement.copy(); errors = lc.error.copy();
sys_err=0.00; nfreq=1; tone_control=5.0
for nharm in range(1,21):
model_cesium = lomb_scargle_model(times-min(times), mags, errors,
sys_err=sys_err, nharm=nharm, nfreq=nfreq, tone_control=tone_control)
period_cesium = 1/model_cesium['freq_fits'][0]['freq']
trend_cesium = model_cesium['freq_fits'][0]['trend']
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(cesium.features.lomb_scargle.lomb_scargle_model.py)
When varying the number of harmonics (
nharm
) in functionlomb_scargle_model()
, the computed model can showcase some instabilities for high nharmonics, not in a regular pattern though (see attached file).Must specify that these instabilities (when changing
nharm
) do not appear for all light-curves tested, but still noticed for some data.In the following, one identified case is reported.
Possible source of error
In real astronomical TS, the flux/mags values would refer to negative values or a different numerical precision that could possibly be the source of underflow/overflow within the optimization part (refine_psd, get_eigs) in
_lomb_scargle.h
and_eigs.h
Possible solution
normalize the signal before fitting the lomb_scargle (temporary solution?)
As a result, the computed model would be a normalized version of the usual model (=computed on initial mag/flux measurements).
Proposition
within
cesium.features.lomb_scargle.lomb_scargle_model.py
:lc = signal
entry in functionsfit_lomb_scargle()
andlomb_scargle_model()
fit_lomb_scargle()
and_lomb_scargle.h
. Output: normalized fitted modelAttached files
displays of initial light_curve superimposed with the estimated trend from cesium_fit for a varying nharm.
The cesium_period is specified for each run.
When computing the cesium model on normalized data, no instabilities are detected.
snippet:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: