-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some status of cases are still be non-blocker even apply blocker to .* to test plan #1492
Comments
Thank you for reporting us your feedback! The internal ticket has been created: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/CHECKBOX-1577.
|
If everything is in the same namespace, the issue does not happen. However, if the override is applied to a test plan in one of the provider (with one namespace), and that test plan is then nested in another provider (with another namespace), the override is not applied. → Issue confirmed. |
A workaround for you: use
instead of
The issue lies in the testplan unit where Checkbox adds the namespace to everything that does not have a namespace. |
Hi @pieqq
The Submission-A use The Submission-B use Compare Submission-A and Submission-B, we can find the |
Bug Description
In PR#1206 Certification team made every test job in client-cert-iot-.* test plans as cert blocker according to a decision made a few years ago which we have been using to judge the bug importance since then (All checkbox jobs being executed for the IoT project is a cert blocker)
Therefore, QA team started implementing this rule in each project. However, we observed that the status is still be
non-blocker
of some cases who are from base provider.Here is the simple PR to implement this feature. What I did is like below (
nest
thecert test plan
and havecertification_status_overrides
field be defined):To Reproduce
com.canonical.certification::client-cert-desktop-22-04-automated
certification_status_overrides
fieldmiscellaneous
andinfo
sets then executing it.Environment
Relevant log output
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: