Review New Assessment: PostgreSQL

[gcharest]

A new assessment has been uploaded and requires peer review by the community.

New Assessment: PostgreSQL

[obrien-j]

It might be worth tailoring the questionnaire based on the technology type.

What specifically were you looking for from a peer review perspective?

[gcharest]

We're looking at putting together a list of OSS projects that we would recommend as mature and well maintained based on the criteria template, a bit like a trusted sources list to help newcomers get started with OSS. It doesn't necessarily need to already be used in the GC yet but could be a discussion starting point for departments. Regarding tailoring the questionnaire, totally makes sense 😀 Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 15 h 14, obrien-j <[email protected]> a écrit :

…

[image: image] <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17616596/52590498-7131ff80-2e0f-11e9-85ee-201f4b813241.png> It might be worth tailoring the questionnaire based on the technology type. What specifically were you looking for from a peer review perspective? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#112 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnJ5ffEY8fzZUVD6DFoDj5n3-L83XkNks5vMc8fgaJpZM4awIi5> .

[gcharest]

I would like this effort to also help socialize the open resources exchange. Our high level reference architecture documents, these assessments and the ORE together could help mature the knowledge of OSS in the government. Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 16 h 23, Guillaume Charest < [email protected]> a écrit :

…

We're looking at putting together a list of OSS projects that we would recommend as mature and well maintained based on the criteria template, a bit like a trusted sources list to help newcomers get started with OSS. It doesn't necessarily need to already be used in the GC yet but could be a discussion starting point for departments. Regarding tailoring the questionnaire, totally makes sense 😀 Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 15 h 14, obrien-j ***@***.***> a écrit : > [image: image] > <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17616596/52590498-7131ff80-2e0f-11e9-85ee-201f4b813241.png> > > It might be worth tailoring the questionnaire based on the technology > type. > > What specifically were you looking for from a peer review perspective? > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#112 (comment)>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnJ5ffEY8fzZUVD6DFoDj5n3-L83XkNks5vMc8fgaJpZM4awIi5> > . >

[goatsweater]

Just to record my inputs from the meeting, I'm cautious about trying to customize it too much because the categories are so broad. The mobile question seems silly for PostgreSQL, but is very relevant to sqlite, for example.

As pointed out in #113 though, it would be nice to have a 'not applicable' type of answer.