Single platform for gc repo vs. approved platforms + catelog

[nschonni]

I'm wondering if an alternate approach is just a catelog like https://code.gov/
I do think that there should be an offer of a platform internally that internal groups can collaborate (GCcode), but when it comes to open source, there are existing projects on multiple platforms already that shouldn't have to move to meet a single winning platform (EX: WET on GitHub vs. AsseblyLine on BitBucket).
Along with the catelog, there should be a recommendation of platforms that meet those functional and non-functional requirements, but I don't think a single choice/lock-in is the best approavh.

[gcharest]

I was just thinking that... Let's go back to what the needs are... Le mer. 9 janv. 2019 17 h 29, Nick Schonning <[email protected]> a écrit :

…

I'm wondering if an alternate approach is just a catelog like https://code.gov/ I do think that there should be an offer of a platform internally that internal groups can collaborate (GCcode), but when it comes to open source, there are existing projects on multiple platforms already that shouldn't have to move to meet a single winning platform (EX: WET on GitHub vs. AsseblyLine on BitBucket). Along with the catelog, there should be a recommendation of platforms that meet those functional and non-functional requirements, but I don't think a single choice/lock-in is the best approavh. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#105>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnJ5Ux2KZ6t0lJNYLL7Gxd9PiqX0_Rjks5vBl9wgaJpZM4Z4S4Y> .

[gcharest]

Just wanted to confirm this question has been discussed at the Advisory Board meeting and further requirements analysis is going to be needed for the overall solution recommended..