Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New way to publish this book #14

Open
pedrofausto opened this issue Nov 22, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

New way to publish this book #14

pedrofausto opened this issue Nov 22, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@pedrofausto
Copy link
Contributor

Could the https://github.com/integrations/gitbook be a better solution to write his book?

@geyslan
Copy link
Member

geyslan commented Nov 22, 2015

Probably.
On 22 Nov 2015 02:18, "Pedro Fausto Rodrigues" [email protected]
wrote:

Could the https://github.com/integrations/gitbook be a better solution to
write his book?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#14.

@pedrofausto
Copy link
Contributor Author

pedrofausto commented Jun 8, 2021

Could we rethink this question?

@geyslan
Copy link
Member

geyslan commented Jun 8, 2021

Sure thing, @pedrofausto. I was recently sharing this repo in a C Telegram group and proposing exactly to solve this issue. 👍

@pedrofausto
Copy link
Contributor Author

We must find a friendly option to edit this book. Not everyone is comfortable with (La)TeX. But we can't afford to lose the aesthetics of the book, since will help newcomers. I was wondering if we can move to https://www.gitbook.com/ ?

@geyslan
Copy link
Member

geyslan commented Jun 8, 2021

In addition to migration, it would be interesting to review the book structure. I think we should use the "Effective C" book as a source of reference and have an approach of coding at the first page, showing a runnable and modern C code asap.

@felipensp
Copy link

Gitbook looks a better option for the project. 👍🏻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants