You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I suppose one way around this would be to choose the "Generic Effect Size" option and calculate standard errors from the variances and sample sizes (probably a safe bet you'd have sample sizes). I still think it would be useful to be able to calculate CIs from variances/std errors and vice versa within different types of effect sizes.
In a similar vein, if the user has only a proportion and sample size, OMA does not calculate the confidence interval. The number of events should not be necessary if the proportion is already known.
If a user has, for example, Hedge's g values and variances, there is no way to calculate a 95% confidence interval.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: