You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 4, 2023. It is now read-only.
Thanks for fixing my other issue. I don't know if you are generally interested in improving fio-cdm further, but I'm going to submit a couple of suggestions if that's OK.
At the moment, fio-cdm outputs the results of the following tests:
Seq
512K
4K
4KQD32
This used to be the same as older versions of Crystal Disk Mark, see for example:
But newer versions of Crystal Disk Mark seem to use the following tests by default:
I also notice in that History file that in 5.0.0 they did "Changed test order (all read test -> all write test)". Again, I don't know if that's important, but it might be worth changing fio-cdm to do the same.
I don't expect we'll ever get to the point where fio-cdm results are directly comparable to CDM, but it would be good to get close.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seq Q32T1: Sequential (Block Size=128KiB) Read/Write with multi Queues & Threads
4K Q32T1: Random 4KiB Read/Write with multi Queues & Threads
Seq: Sequential (Block Size=1MiB) Read/Write with single Thread
4K: Random 4KiB Read Write with single Queue & Thread
You can customize the number of Queues & Threads from "Settings > Queues & Threads" menu.
This is my python version with a lot of customizabilities (it works on Windows, too): https://github.com/OliverLew/fio-cdm
It can solve a lot of the feature requests and I plan to work on some more. But caution the result could be incorrect due to my fio settings :)
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Thanks for fixing my other issue. I don't know if you are generally interested in improving fio-cdm further, but I'm going to submit a couple of suggestions if that's OK.
At the moment, fio-cdm outputs the results of the following tests:
This used to be the same as older versions of Crystal Disk Mark, see for example:
But newer versions of Crystal Disk Mark seem to use the following tests by default:
I don't know why they changed, but it might be worth researching this to see if you can do the same in fio-cdm. https://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalDiskMark/manual-en/History.html may be a good place to start looking.
I also notice in that History file that in 5.0.0 they did "Changed test order (all read test -> all write test)". Again, I don't know if that's important, but it might be worth changing fio-cdm to do the same.
I don't expect we'll ever get to the point where fio-cdm results are directly comparable to CDM, but it would be good to get close.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: