Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Paralegal command line arguments should be considered when deciding whether to invalidate the compile cache #75

Open
JustusAdam opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Paralegal command line arguments should be considered when deciding whether to invalidate the compile cache #75

JustusAdam opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
flow-analysis Concerns the PDG construction component

Comments

@JustusAdam
Copy link
Collaborator

We should probably force recompilation if the paralegal-flow command line arguments change because they can influence the output. I might not have to be every single one but arguments like --no-cross-function-analysis and --no-local-function-type-marking for instance.

A special case here is --external-annotations, which should also cause a recompile if the file got modified.
@JustusAdam JustusAdam added the flow-analysis Concerns the PDG construction component label Oct 9, 2023
@JustusAdam JustusAdam changed the title Paralegal argument should be considered when deciding whether to recompile Paralegal argument should be considered when deciding whether to invalidate the compile cache Oct 12, 2023
@JustusAdam JustusAdam changed the title Paralegal argument should be considered when deciding whether to invalidate the compile cache Paralegal command line arguments should be considered when deciding whether to invalidate the compile cache Oct 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
flow-analysis Concerns the PDG construction component
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JustusAdam