Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Download bridgedb upon first run of docker #7

Open
nunogit opened this issue Feb 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Download bridgedb upon first run of docker #7

nunogit opened this issue Feb 9, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@nunogit
Copy link
Contributor

nunogit commented Feb 9, 2018

Advantages:

  • smaller initial footprint on images
  • we can allow specie selection for db (upon first run)

Disadvantes:

  • we should check if this is according to Docker philosophy
  • how to manage versions of BDB inside the containers, namely for reproducibility?
  • we can't tie bdb versions to tag distributions
@egonw
Copy link
Member

egonw commented Mar 9, 2018

Sounds reasonable to me. Alternatively, the Docker image would distribute the archived version and decompress upon first run. But whatever you think is best, works for me

@egonw egonw removed their assignment Mar 9, 2018
@egonw
Copy link
Member

egonw commented Apr 17, 2018

BridgeDb 2.3.0 is released.

@egonw
Copy link
Member

egonw commented Jun 2, 2018

Ping, what is the status of this?

@marvinm2
Copy link
Collaborator

marvinm2 commented Jun 2, 2018

It is now included in the image with pre-set mapping files. Not a selection on first run, as described by Nuno. Could push various versions with different mapping possibilities (selections, only human, or all).

By the way, why is it not possible to tie bridgedb versions to tags? We can make custom singular tags that contain various types of info like bdb version + mappings included. If we would then describe what these tag structures mean, it would solve that right? Or am I missing the point here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants